Activity
From 01/28/2019 to 02/26/2019
02/19/2019
- BD 08:47 PM PCB Development: RE: Use of DAC904E
- Vivek,
We have not done any development with the DAC904E. It may be possible to use the current code in a single channel mode, but you will need to review the datasheet carefully.
Our design files, with full source code (and VHDL)... - BD 08:30 PM Software Development: RE: We want to know about SPI for CAN Interface with Linux
- Are you using the latest MDK available under the files tab?
https://support.criticallink.com/redmine/projects/arm9-platforms/files
Filename: mitydsp-l138-MDK-gui-2018-04-13.sh
This filesystem has the can-utils installed. This is p...
02/18/2019
- SK 07:05 PM Software Development: RE: We want to know about SPI for CAN Interface with Linux
- In addition, should i make node with 'mknod' command?
- I sent the following mail to Developers:
> We bought MityDSP-L138F with Industrial IO Board.
> ...
And I got a following Answer:
> The mcp251x driver is already in the kernel and you should be able to access the CAN device via can0....
02/16/2019
- Hi,
We have been testing our own inhouse carrier board with MityDSP OMPAL138F module. The inhouse carrier board had the ADC and DAC suggested in the Analog Expansion board. We find that we do not need the dual channel DAC and we wish ...