Activity
From 06/26/2014 to 07/25/2014
07/14/2014
- 09:43 AM Software Development: RE: SPI clock issues with using newest u-boot
- Yeah by using the ti_ 335x include files I was hoping to greatly simplify our config file. Hopefully it hasn't cause...
- 09:31 AM Software Development: RE: SPI clock issues with using newest u-boot
- Ok,
I knew it had to be in there somewhere, was just a bit confused
as the original mityarm335x.h had a nice ... - 09:26 AM Software Development: RE: SPI clock issues with using newest u-boot
- Pretty sure I found "#define CONFIG_SPI" in one of the ti_ config files that get included.
- 09:25 AM Software Development: RE: SPI clock issues with using newest u-boot
- Yes the Micron N25Q00AA does support the 48Mhz clock. The sf erase still seems longer
but I'll need to time it get ...
07/11/2014
- 05:26 PM Software Development: RE: SPI clock issues with using newest u-boot
- Also make sure your Nor chip supports 48Mhz on the spi bus.
- 05:25 PM Software Development: RE: SPI clock issues with using newest u-boot
- Did you notice any time difference with the slower speed?
- 03:30 PM Software Development: RE: SPI clock issues with using newest u-boot
- I took out the CONFIG_SPI_FLASH_BAR define and it now seem to pass the long erase command.
-----------------------... - 02:23 PM Software Development: RE: SPI clock issues with using newest u-boot
- It may be perfectly fine with the generic name then.
Try changing the spi clock speed and see if you get different... - 02:19 PM Software Development: RE: SPI clock issues with using newest u-boot
- I added the CONFIG_SPI_FLASH_BAR define to mityarm335x.h and the warning is goes away on the "sf probe" command.
I a... - 01:38 PM Software Development: RE: SPI clock issues with using newest u-boot
- 1) I'm not sure why its detecting it differently. Maybe the newer u-boot has a more specific driver for this chip?
... - 12:44 PM Software Development: RE: SPI clock issues with using newest u-boot
- Hey Johnathan,
Testing out the new spi bus changes seem fine. I do have two quick questions:
1) The original...
07/10/2014
- 05:10 PM PCB Development: RE: Time drift
- The skipping bad block is not an error but more of an info. Blocks can be marked bad from factory and during use. T...
- 04:19 PM PCB Development: RE: Time drift
- The clock is working now. Thank you.
But when we flash the nand, there is an error:
root@mityarm-335x:~# flash_... - 03:29 PM PCB Development: RE: Time drift
- So if this is the problem I'm thinking of. It was discovered that when we changed to the 3.2 kernel we weren't setti...
- 03:26 PM PCB Development: RE: Time drift
- Hey Jonathan,
Thanks again, we will definitely try this solution and let you know if it works. I would like to kno... - 03:00 PM PCB Development: RE: Time drift
- I've attached the lastest uImage but yes you can build it if you would like. Instructions are here [[Linux_Kernel]]
... - 02:57 PM PCB Development: RE: Time drift
- NAND read: device 0 offset 0x340000, size 0x500000
Skipping bad block 0x00780000
5242880 bytes read: OK
## Bootin... - 02:56 PM PCB Development: RE: Time drift
- We used the pre-build kernel image that came with the board. The kernel that in the Virtual Machine/home/mitydsp/proj...
- 08:12 AM PCB Development: RE: Time drift
- What version of the kernel came with your devkit? Could you post a boot log?
Particularly I want to know if your ...
07/09/2014
- 05:12 PM Software Development: RE: SPI clock issues with using newest u-boot
- Just pushed a fix for this.
http://support.criticallink.com/gitweb/?p=u-boot-mityarm-335x.git;a=commit;h=82762ccda72... - 04:33 PM PCB Development: RE: Time drift
- Here is our clock tree (in /sys/kernel/debug/clock/summary):
clock-name parent-name ... - 04:14 PM PCB Development: RE: Time drift
- When we boot into Linux and use the "date" (system clock) and "hwclock" (RTC I assume) commands to set/ask for time, ...
- 08:02 AM PCB Development: RE: Time drift
- Hi,
What do you mean by "hardware and software" clocks. Are you using the RTC or just the system clock? Can you ...
07/08/2014
- Hello,
We bought a MityARM335x dev kit months ago. We have noticed that the time on the board (both software and h...
07/01/2014
- 09:49 AM Software Development: RE: SPI clock issues with using newest u-boot
- U-Boot# sf probe 0:0
SF: Unsupported flash IDs: manuf ff, jedec ffff, ext_jedec ffff
Failed to initialize SPI flash... - 09:49 AM Software Development: RE: SPI clock issues with using newest u-boot
- Jonathan,
I checked with manufacturing and they do use the command in verification
of basic communication wit...
06/30/2014
- 05:06 PM Software Development: RE: SPI clock issues with using newest u-boot
- Following your lead and my hardware engineers suggestion we did a temporary check and set 0x44E00050
(CM_PER_SPI1_C... - 05:03 PM Software Development: RE: SPI clock issues with using newest u-boot
- Committed change.
http://support.criticallink.com/gitweb/?p=u-boot-mityarm-335x.git;a=commit;h=bc7833792442421a60e74... - 04:54 PM Software Development: RE: SPI clock issues with using newest u-boot
- I'm testing this change right now and am going to push a commit if it works.
- 04:48 PM Software Development: RE: SPI clock issues with using newest u-boot
- Thanks. Let me take a look and if it works.
- 04:45 PM Software Development: RE: SPI clock issues with using newest u-boot
- I think I found the problem. The memory address 0x481A0000 refers to McSPI1 and only spi0 is enabled in the u-boot.
... - 04:40 PM Software Development: RE: SPI clock issues with using newest u-boot
- We had originally set up to boot out of SPI NOR and on occasion do use that ability for
manufacturing testing. The ... - 04:16 PM Software Development: RE: SPI clock issues with using newest u-boot
- No since booting from the spi nor on our SoMs doesn't work and I wasn't aware of anyone using the nor, I didn't look ...
- 03:40 PM Software Development: RE: SPI clock issues with using newest u-boot
- Hey Jonathan,
Looking at your release without any of my mods, serial NOR was removed (no sf commands.) Was ther...
06/27/2014
- 08:26 PM Software Development: RE: SPI clock issues with using newest u-boot
- It's possible or even probable that name of the pound defines changed in this version. You can check the Readme to se...
- 04:41 PM Software Development: RE: SPI clock issues with using newest u-boot
- Hey Jonathan,
Do I only need the "#define CONFIG_SPI"? I've tried that along with (from the original mityarm35x... - 04:29 PM Software Development: RE: SPI clock issues with using newest u-boot
- It does look like SPI was not enabled in the new u-boot config. Checkout the differences in include/configs/mityarm3...
- After moving to the newest u-boot we are having issues running SPI bus. Accessing the McSPI registers (0x481A0000) ca...
Also available in: Atom
Go to top
